Blog / UGC production / Asset handoff
UGC Raw Footage vs. Edited Deliverables: What to Request
UGC raw footage gives your editor material to assemble. Edited deliverables give your team a finished sequence to review and publish. Choose between them by deciding who will edit, what needs to change later, and which files the next person must be able to open. If you need both immediate launch assets and room to create new versions, specify both as separate deliverables.
This guide is for brand and paid media teams commissioning creator content. It covers the production handoff: source clips, clean exports, finished videos, project files, and acceptance. For the broader choice between buying content and buying publication, use our UGC vs. influencer marketing guide.
What each deliverable actually gives your team
Do not use “raw files” as a catch-all. In a UGC brief, it might mean unedited camera recordings, selected takes, or an edited video without captions. Those are different products. Here, raw footage means the agreed original recorded clips; it does not mean a particular camera RAW format.
| Deliverable | What you receive | What still needs work |
|---|---|---|
| Raw footage | Agreed recorded takes, such as dialogue, demonstrations, and supporting shots | Selection, assembly, sound, captions, finishing, and approval |
| Selected takes | An agreed subset of usable clips, usually identified by shot or take | Editing; confirm who selected them and what was excluded |
| Clean export | An edited sequence with specified overlays or music removed | New captions or finishing; the underlying cuts remain fixed |
| Finished edit | A complete video with the agreed sound, text, graphics, and format | Final brand review and placement checks |
| Editable project package | Timeline or project plus agreed media and supporting dependencies | Opening, relinking, compatibility checks, and further editing |
A clean export is not a substitute for source clips. You can add new text to it, but an editor cannot reliably recover a camera angle or a full spoken sentence that was removed from the cut. A project file alone may also be insufficient if its linked media is missing.
Choose the package around the next editing decision
Start with a named editing owner and a specific future task. “We might use it later” is less useful than “our editor needs to create two new openings using the same product demonstration.”
| Your next task | Request before the shoot | Confirm with the receiving team |
|---|---|---|
| Launch an approved video with no internal editor | Finished edits in the agreed placements and languages | Who approves the first cut, who makes revisions, and who checks exports |
| Recut openings or change the sequence | Selected or raw takes mapped to the shot list | Editor capacity, usable dialogue, coverage, and time for review |
| Add another caption language to the same cut | Clean export, approved transcript, and separate captions where needed | What “clean” removes; who checks translation, timing, and meaning |
| Rebuild the edit extensively | Project package and agreed source media | Editing software/version, dependencies, and an actual open-and-relink check |
| Launch now and prepare later variations | Finished edits plus a defined set of source takes | Separate counts, acceptance criteria, and owners for both packages |
Raw footage moves editing work to the receiving team. Include that work when comparing proposals: selection, assembly, audio cleanup, captioning, quality checks, storage, and review rounds. There is no universal price relationship between raw and edited packages; scope and commercial terms determine the quote.
For a repeating program, use the same asset IDs across briefs, folders, and media reports. That makes a Creator Factory pilot easier to hand from production to the next editor without losing the reason each version exists.
Write the handoff specification before filming
A useful request says which material must arrive and how someone will verify it. Avoid “send everything” when you only need a small set of reusable shots.
- List the required dialogue takes, product demonstrations, supporting shots, and screen recordings against the approved shot list.
- Agree whether delivery includes all recorded takes or selected usable takes. Specify exclusions and identify incomplete or unusable material rather than silently omitting a required shot.
- State the intended placements, capture orientation, output dimensions, frame rate, and audio requirements with the editor. A later crop may cut off the product or demonstration.
- Define clean versions precisely: for example, the same approved cut with dialogue intact, without baked-in captions, music, or end-card text. List any branding that must remain.
- Request transcripts, separate caption files, dialogue tracks, or project files only when the planned workflow needs them and they are included in scope.
- Set a delivery folder, access owner, deadline, retention period, naming convention, and revision process. Check that the receiving editor can download the files.
Platform specifications should be checked for the actual placement. TikTok's auction in-feed specifications explain that the safe zone varies with video dimensions, caption length, and additional formats. Review the product, text, and CTA in that context instead of treating one overlay template as universal.
For an editable Premiere handoff, Adobe's project transfer guidance describes collecting project files and media together while preserving folder structure. Make opening the delivered package on the receiving editor's computer an acceptance check. List dependencies that need separate handling, including fonts, plugins, graphics, and licensed assets.
A worked example: two versions, not ten new concepts
Consider a hypothetical travel organizer campaign. The brand wants to compare two openings while keeping the demonstration and CTA consistent. These quantities illustrate a scope; they are not a Holy Marketing package or a performance recommendation.
| Item | Agreed delivery in this example | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Opening takes | One approved take for opening A and one for opening B | 2 source clips |
| Shared demonstration | One continuous packing demonstration | 1 source clip |
| Shared CTA | One take inviting viewers to check product dimensions | 1 source clip |
| Supporting detail | Two agreed product close-ups | 2 source clips |
| Finished versions | Opening A + shared sequence; opening B + shared sequence | 2 exports |
| Clean versions | Same two edits, without captions or music; dialogue retained | 2 exports |
That is six source clips and four exports, supporting two ad variants. It is not ten concepts. Additional takes, another language, a square crop, or a new demonstration need their own line in the agreed scope.
Name each file so the editor can identify its role and revision. For example: ORG_US_EN_HOOK-A_T01.mp4 for a source take and ORG_US_EN_A_EDIT_V02.mp4 for a finished edit. Keep approval status in the delivery register; a filename containing “final” is not evidence that the brand approved it.
The source package should preserve enough material for the agreed next edit. If a new opening needs a full sentence, check that the delivered take contains that sentence and usable space around it. A fragment extracted from the final video may not serve that purpose.
Accept the package with a file register
Download the UGC asset handoff register. It contains a clearly marked hypothetical example and a blank row. Replace the example with your own agreed scope; each row represents one file to receive or one package to verify.
Use three separate checks. A download can succeed even when an asset is unsuitable for the campaign.
| Check | Evidence to record | Action if it fails |
|---|---|---|
| File integrity | Download opens; expected duration, dimensions, audio, and dependencies are present | Request a corrected transfer or export; identify the exact asset ID |
| Creative acceptance | Required shot, approved product facts, language, and version match the brief | Consolidate feedback against the agreed assignment |
| Release readiness | Approver, intended use, placement check, and permission record are complete | Hold publication until the responsible owner resolves the missing item |
For raw clips, watch the agreed material rather than checking filenames alone. For a clean export, confirm the promised layers are absent and dialogue remains usable. For a project package, test that it opens and the relevant media relinks. Mark items “received,” “needs correction,” or “accepted,” and record the reviewer and date.
A file that meets the original brief but is now being asked to do something different is a scope change. A missing agreed shot or corrupted export is a delivery issue. Keeping those categories separate makes feedback more precise and avoids asking an editor to solve a production omission through guesswork.
Keep files, usage, and account permissions separate
Record the intended editing and publishing scope alongside the asset register. Receiving a file should not be your only evidence that the planned use has been agreed. Use the UGC usage-rights checklist for the commercial permissions record, including channels, markets, duration, and editing scope.
Platform authorization is another handoff item. For example, TikTok Spark Ads can use another creator's organic post with their authorization. A folder of exported videos does not demonstrate that this authorization is active. Assign a person to confirm the relevant account setup before paid distribution.
Questions to settle before accepting a quote
Is raw footage always included? Specify it as a deliverable. Ask whether the quote covers all takes, selected takes, or only finished exports, and identify any separate scope or cost.
Can a clean export replace an editable project? Only when the next task fits that export. Adding new captions to a fixed sequence is different from changing cuts, removing graphics already baked into the image, or rebuilding the timeline.
Should a brand request both raw and edited content? When there is a defined use and an owner for each. An unused source library still creates transfer, storage, and review work. Request the material your next editing decision needs.
Who approves the files? Name a production reviewer for technical acceptance, a brand reviewer for creative accuracy, and an owner for release readiness. One person can hold multiple roles, but the decisions should remain explicit.
Turn the scope into a production brief
Use the UGC creative brief template to connect this package to the audience, product demonstration, and creative question. The final scope should let the creator quote the work, the editor understand the handoff, and the brand know what it is accepting.
Holy Marketing plans creator programs across the United States, all Latin American countries including the Caribbean, and 15 countries in Africa. Projects start at $20,000 per month. Explore Creator Factory or book a planning call to discuss the production and editing workflow your team needs.